« [ NIKON D200 digital slr announced ] | Main | [ ACDSee8 Photo manager ] »
November 03, 2005
[ DIGITAL’S NEXT VICTIM ]
Digital technology continues to cut a swathe through the businesses built on chemical-based photography. First Kodak was forced to sack thousands of workers at its plants around the world as demand for film and chemical processing dropped. Photo processing shops around Australia started to close as amateur photographers printed their own photos or used the internet or CD and DVD as their preferred display media.
Now the photographic firm of Agfa is bankrupt. The announcement in May that the company AgfaPhoto had filed for bankruptcy protection sent a chill through the company’s world operations. Then this month DW-World reports that the company will probably cease to exist by the end of the year.
Australian photo processors, including Woolworths, that have Agfa machines and processes installed in their stores now looking for alternative suppliers. Woolworths has Agfa processing kiosks in 115 of its Big-W stores.
Agfa made a half-hearted attempt to make the transition from chemicals to digital but their cameras were uninspiring and never sold in sufficient numbers to save the company. Then they moved the focus of their business onto the supply of processing machines, paper and chemicals, but that also failed to revive the ailing company’s fortunes.
Agfa has its origins in Germany in 1867 and marketed its first colour film in 1936. Until Fuji became a market force Agfa was the alternative to the dominant player, Kodak. Unlike Ilford, which has reacted to the change in photographic technology by using its paper making expertise to move into the production of superior inkjet papers, Agfa appears to have misjudged the size and permanence of the digital tidal wave.
On another front in the digital transition, even though digital camera sales are booming the benefit has not flowed to the smaller suburban camera shops. Electrical goods retailers like K Mart, Dick Smith, JB Hi-Fi, Harvey Norman and RetraVision along with specialist computer shops are eating into the traditional business of the small camera shop.
Robert Heim, director of the retail buying group Just Picture It, says that the traditional camera shop is being squeezed at both ends of the business. “Profit margins on digital cameras are very low and the small shop doesn’t have the other departments selling whitegoods, computers, electrical appliances and furnishings over which the entire cost of running the store can be amortised.
“At the other end the demand for 35mm film and photo finishing services has dropped because photographers are getting their emotional kick instantly from the LCD screen on the camera and many photos that are taken are not being printed.
“A few of the big city camera stores are doing well from selling digital cameras but out in the suburbs the camera shops are missing out on the benefits of the boom.”
The small, individual traders can also be hurt by the catalogue advertising of bigger stores and franchise groups. In June this year the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found that the franchise group IT Warehouse had advertised in its catalogues “a number of Nikon digital cameras as being available for sale from its stores. However, many IT Warehouse stores had stock levels which were inadequate, or non-existent, and in any event were disproportionate to the discounted price and the level of the promotion.
“The ACCC believed the representations in the catalogues were misleading and deceptive…”
IT Warehouse gave an undertaking to cease and desist but by that time the retailers who brought the complaint had already lost business.
The new technology has created new opportunities and new victims at the same time.
*
Posted by terry at November 3, 2005 07:24 AM
Comments
G'Day Terry,
The demise of Agfa is absolutely shamefull! No digital image, even from Hasselblads 22MP back, see; http://www.imacon.dk/sw2264.asp will even come close to Agfapan 25 black and white 120 rollfilm or 4" X 5" sheet film for serious photography. I'm yet to see any black and white digital images that come within cooee of traditional film!
Posted by: Robert Ashman at November 4, 2005 03:18 PM
You have a point. I always used Agfa Brovira paper for my black and white work [with occasional uses of Ilford Multigrade for economy reasons]. I have a lot of B&W portraits made on Agfa paper and I certainly can't get an inkjet print to match them.
I haven't tried the Epson printer with the three black cartridges -- perhaps that will have tonal quality approaching a good silver halide print.
Confession: I haven't gone into the darkroom since I bought my Nikon D70 -- and I don't think I ever will. It's a mix of laziness and aversion to the chemicals and the whole miserable business of cleaning up after a printing session that keeps me out, rather than the superior quality of digital.
Posted by: Terry at November 4, 2005 06:56 PM
That's a real pity Terry,as one can be far more creative in a darkroom than with any digital process, particularly with black and white. Plus methinks I'm a bit addicted to working under a Safelight and the lovely (sic) aromas of Acetic Acid and Hypo.
Posted by: Robert Ashman at November 4, 2005 08:37 PM

