« [ A STUDIO FOR 20 BUCKS–an update ] | Main | [ PANASONIC DMC-TZ1 - Review ] »
May 31, 2006
[ WANT A GOOD PRINTER? BUY TWO! ]

dpexpert has had a few requests for advice on printers in the past couple of weeks, causing us to give the matter some serious thought.
Rule number one for printer purchasing is that you get what you pay for. So, for instance, a photo printer that does nothing but produce prints may be the same price as a multifunction printer but common sense tells you that that the combined printer/scanner/copier won’t produce prints of the same quality as the dedicated photo printer.
The multi-function units look like real bargains when compared with the single purpose printers, and they can be very good, but if your intention is to produce the best quality prints from your digital files then the photo printer is the way to go.
The price of a printer is also related to the size of print that it can produce. For domestic use printers start from small units that produce 10cm by 15cm prints, the standard photo lab size. Some of these, such as the excellent Epson Picturemate 500, produce stunning prints. But if you want something bigger then you have to choose between A4 and A3 or A3+ machines. (A3+ produces prints 13 inches by 19 inches -- pardon the imperial measurements but that is the way these printers and paper are described.)
Both Canon and Epson produce photo printers in these sizes. Canon printers have a slight edge in sharpness and colour accuracy, Epson printers produce longer lasting prints. All the best inkjet photo printers use a lot of cartridges and they are expensive to run. dpexpert's Canon i9950 printer has 8 individual cartridges and they cost about $22 each in most shops. Replacing any or all of these cartridges really hurts so some restraint is called for in their use.
Generally speaking ink cartridges are cheaper at the computer swap meets advertised every week in the Green Guide. We have seen the Canon units for as little as $16, but even at that price a full set can make the credit card squirm. Third party inks and ink refills have their advocates but dpexpert's experience with these substitutes has been bad. Very bad! We have one totally wrecked printer due to print head clogging. On the basis of this instructive experience our advice is to avoid third party inks even though the price is attractive.
Some years ago we came to the conclusion that the only way to avoid printer-induced bankruptcy was to buy two printers. This may sound mad, but consider this.
Inkjet cartridges are expensive and their capacity is miniscule. If a top quality inkjet is used for everyday printing of documents, letters etc the cartridges, particularly the black, will require frequent replacement. Epson claim that their Stylus Photo 800, an outstanding 8 cartridge printer, will produce 400 pages of 5 per cent coverage from a set of inks. In an ideal world this might be true, but in any case a cartridge replacement set will cost about $144 at current street prices. Compare this with a laser printer, such as the Canon LB3000 which has a street price of about $160 and can produce 2500 pages of 5 per cent coverage from a single toner cartridge. A replacement toner cartridge costs about $120 (so the printer is costing $40!) for the genuine Canon item and considerably less for the “brown box” alternative. In this case we have had no problems with third party toners.
It is obvious that while buying two printers might seem counter intuitive if your aim is to save money this is one time when common sense makes no sense at all. The laser is cheaper and produces better type output on plain paper than the inkjet which is optimised for expensive photo paper. The LB3000 is also a fast printer, much quicker than any inkjet unit.
All printers these days connect via USB so there is no problem in having more than one. Switching between printers is done easily in the software being used whether its Word or Photoshop or Thunderbird.
Our work practice is to reserve the inkjet printer for printing high quality images from digital sources. For the dogsbody, high volume work the little Canon LB3000 is the printer of choice.
*
Posted by terry at May 31, 2006 11:44 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/893
Comments
Canon's inks have a shorter life (though pretty good) than Epson's, otherwise the i9950 A3 printer is the ants pants.
Canon have announced their ChromaLife 100 *pigment* inks for life beyond what I care. Thing is, they say the new cartridges won't go in their best pro-am printer. "Buy our new printer." Meanies.
Is that it?
Posted by: Peter Allen at June 1, 2006 09:05 AM
I have seen the new Canon professional printer -- expected to be on sale around September -- and it does use pigment inks which are not compatible with models like the i9950. So you're right -- start saving for a new printer.
Incidentally, it looks sensational. It has been designed/crafted to match the Canon 5D camera in appearance -- all matte black finish.
Posted by: Terry at June 2, 2006 12:29 AM
After much googling on i9950 [or i9900 overseas] and ChromaLife, I'm not so sure we won't be using the new inks in BCI-7 cartridges. Canon are always close about future plans, but:
from http://www.photo-i.co.uk/News/Nov04/121.htm
Could you ask Canon about the BCI-7 ink set, if it will become available in Europe, if it will work in the current Pixma and i9950 printers and what these inks could do for us.
To repeat an earlier statement, the BCI-7 ink set is for the Far East market. Canon have no plans (at least none that they were prepared to disclose) to introduce them to the European market. I personally would treat this answer with a pinch of salt, I can’t imagine them not introducing these inks to Europe, especially as most of the information is now in the public domain.
Posted by: Peter Allen at June 2, 2006 06:42 AM
Hi. This is really interesting post. Thank You! I have just subscribed to Your rss!
Best regards
Posted by: Forexman at May 25, 2008 07:18 AM
Hi. This is really interesting post. Thank You! I have just subscribed to Your rss!
Best regards
Posted by: Forexman at May 25, 2008 06:28 PM

