« [ MAHA POWEREX battery charger & batteries ] | Main | [ REVIEW — CANON EOS30D DSLR ] »

July 20, 2006

[ FROM FILM TO DIGITAL -- it’s just about all over ]

IF YOU'RE THE SORT OF PERSON who hopes that digital photography is a passing fad we can only suggest that you take a look at Kodak’s Australian web site (www.kodak.com.au) There you will see that the company that was founded on film -- the light-sensitive silver halide emulsion on a transparent flexible backing -- now offers only one compact film camera, the Advantix T20, and three throwaways for sale. Compare that with the bewildering array of 25 digital cameras it has on offer.

The story is much the same with other manufacturers and distributors. Canon lists five film compact cameras on its site (www.canon.com.au) but you might have difficulty finding a shop that stocks them. Nikon has no compact film cameras and only two film single lens reflex cameras, one for the pros and one marketed to students learning the craft.

Steve Mills, senior salesman in Ted’s Digital Corporate division, says that the last Nikon F6 film SLRs had to be sold at a loss to move them off the shelf.

Mills says that film sales to serious photographers, along with photographic paper and chemicals, have been declining at the rate of 20 to 30 per cent a year. At the same time the sales of inkjet printers and associated consumables have been increasing at the same rate. The last enlarger that Mills sold was “some years ago” and since then he has sold only one enlarger lens. It is not so surprising then that Nikon abandoned the manufacture of enlarger lenses in January this year.

Sales staff at Ted’s city store reckon that they sell one compact film camera every fortnight.

It is now four years since the milestone was reached where more digital cameras than film cameras were sold world wide. This year the digital cameras are taking 92 per cent of the market. Companies that were slow to appreciate the speed with which digital would be embraced have been swept aside, the most prominent casualty of the revolution being the proud of company Agfa, admired by serious amateurs and professionals for the quality of their black and white photographic paper as well as being a major supplier of minilab processing machines, chemicals and paper. Kodak has survived, but only by shedding thousands of staff around the world and closing their Australian manufacturing plant.

Andy Wu, manager of the suburban Kodak Express camera shop and processing laboratory in the Forest Hill shopping centre, says that some of the lost film sales are compensated for with camera memory card sales. Sadly for the retailer memory cards are reusable, unlike single use film.

He says that he usually has one compact film camera in stock for the occasional customer not ready to make the transition to digital. Sales of film cameras run at about one every two weeks.

Wu has a particularly loyal customer base because of his shop’s reputation for quality processing but even so his ratio of prints made from film and from digital files is now about 1:1.

Life is particularly tough for the operators of small camera stores with on-site processing. Supermarkets have entered into the one hour processing in a big way with do-it-yourself kiosks for customers with digital memory cards. And the big electrical goods retailers all sell cameras that these days qualify as electronic gadgets. Put bluntly, the digital revolution has left a huge pile of casualties in its wake.

How long will companies like Kodak and Fuji continue to make film? Steve Mills believes that the availability of 35mm film will always be tied to the motion picture industry. As long as movie makers shoot and distribute on film it will be economically feasible to cut the film into strips and load it into cassettes -- after all that is where it all started with the first Leica in 1925. But, once the movies go beginning-to-end digital, film will be finished, at least for the amateur photographer unless some small start-up company moves into the vacuum left by the retreat of the big companies from the business. Silver-based photography may survive but in an expensive and esoteric and slightly eccentric form.

*

Posted by terry at July 20, 2006 10:22 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/974

Comments

Some of us still like using film and will continue to do so, because we like it. The unavailability of new film cameras is a bit depressing, but not unexpected, given that good second hand film cameras can be had for next to nothing, and a full darkroom can be setup for well,… nothing! Film users have never had it so good, most of the equipment can be had for free!

What really matters is the continued availability of film & processing, & hopefully film will be around for a few more years yet.

There is a very active online community of film users at www.apug.org, with over 13,000 members, and lots of information about film & processing, and absolutely no digital talk, which is very refeshing for some of us.

Cheers,

Geoff.

Posted by: GSB at July 22, 2006 04:56 AM

While a lot of film and photographic paper producers have lost profits and gone out of business, it their own fault for not anticipating the trend towards digital.

They could have continued in the market if they had produced a cheap form of colour print production for the home user, similar to the black and white photograph, so enabling film camera users to produce colour prints at comparative cost.

The only reason I used black and white film stock for 30 years was because of the cost of developing and printing colour prints.
It must have been apparent even to Kodak that the ability to take colour photos if and when you want without waiting even for the 1 hr outlets, was upermost in most digital buyers minds.
The other prime factor was the ability to take hundreds of photos at no outlay, with the ability to view them at no cost on a computer and without the need to having to print every or even any one photo.

There is still a market for film cameras, although only minute, with the ability to scan the negatives and print if required.
However the inability to preview and discard photos without incurring film wastage is a major setback, and will lead to the ultimate total demise of the sensitized film as a photo medium.
Photoshop and Microsoft were the saviours for most amateur film users and paved the way for the upsurge in creative photographic imaging.

Posted by: Ian Pearson at October 8, 2007 04:08 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the security code you see here

(you may use HTML tags for style)