« [ SONY DSLR ALPHA100 sample images ] | Main | [ SONY DSLR-A100 digital SLR camera ] »

August 17, 2006

[ HOW MUCH CAMERA DO I NEED? ]

THE KODAK EASYSHARE V610(see the review) is the latest in a category of camera that fits longer and longer zoom lenses into smaller and smaller bodies.

The first of the so-called super zooms came from Konica Minolta, Canon, Sony and Panasonic. These are the small pseudo-single lens reflex cameras with zoom focal length ranges between 28mm and 430mm. They all have electronic viewfinders for eye-level framing and some have image stabilisation to minimise the effects of camera shake.

Kodak’s super zoom reduces the camera volume even further by doing away with the viewfinder and using two lenses to cover the range. Panasonic’s Lumix TZ1 takes another approach, using a sort of horizontal periscope arrangement of the lens elements to fit a long range zoom into a compact body.

Many digital camera customers find these superzooms very appealing. They seem to be equal to a single lens reflex camera plus a bag of lenses all at a price well below an SLR and additional glass. Here at Imaging we are constantly surprised at the number of SLR film-camera owners who want to be reassured that the Canon S3 or the Sony H1 is an adequate replacement for their old camera. Apparently they’ve grown weary of the weight of the SLR gear which makes them more likely to leave the camera home than to take it to the Zoo.

The super zooms do have a few things going for them. The light weight, small bulk and price, for a start. The lenses are not only versatile, they are also generally good. Canon use their own lenses, Sony use Zeiss and Panasonic use Leica optics. Kodak brand their lenses as Schneider of Kreuznach to appeal to those old enough to remember the excellent Retina range of film cameras. Kreuznach seems to have relocated to China, but never mind.

How do they do it for the price? In part it is because of the size of the sensor in a digital camera. A 35mm film frame is 36mm by 24mm. A typical sensor in a compact digital camera, including the super zooms, will be around 6mm by 4mm (sizes vary from camera to camera). A digital single lens reflex may have a typical sensor size of 24mm by 16mm. The most expensive digital SLRs have sensors the same dimensions as a 35mm film.

The compact camera sensor is tiny which has benefits and costs. Because of the small area that has to be illuminated by the lens the optics can be smaller and therefore cheaper. Depth of field is greater with the smaller sensor which makes focussing slightly less critical. In fact one of the most frequent complaints from super zoom owners is that the depth of field is too great. It can be difficult or impossible to produce a picture with an attractive out-of-focus background.

The tiny sensor produces another unwanted side effect -- picture noise. This is the grainy effect generated by the sensor when too many photo-receptors are set too close together. The larger sensors in SLRs are less prone to picture noise because of the greater pixel size and pitch. The Nikon D70 SLR has six million pixels on an area approximately 24 by 16mm. The Canon S3IS super zoom also has six million pixels but on an area 6 by 4mm. The Canon S3 produces nice pictures but the Nikon D70 does better.

Where the single lens reflex triumphs over any other type of camera is in the viewfinder. Electronic viewfinders give a crude representation of the subject, rather like looking at a small portion of a TV screen close-up and through a magnifying glass. These EVFs are low resolution affairs that do not give enough information to judge focus and tonal distribution. A good single lens reflex connects the photographer directly with the subject.

When it comes to responsiveness there is no contest. Compact superzooms have improved over the past couple of years but they still feel squishy compared with the instantaneous response to the shutter button that you get with an SLR.

Bottom line: the ideal kit consists of a digital single lens reflex and enough lenses to reach from 24mm to 300mm, plus a compact digital camera such as the excellent Canon Ixus 800is or the Sony Cybershot DSCW100 for those times when portability is needed or an SLR might look a bit pretentious. Imaging speaks from desire, not from experience!

*

Posted by terry at August 17, 2006 03:30 AM

Worth Checking Out

Digital Cameras Sydney

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1010

Comments

terry:

thanks for the exposé; a couple more of these and the (hitherto) quandry of not being able to sort the 'real' benefit from the advertising benefit will evaporate!

esp the sensor size issue - one that I (for one) did not know about!

cheers

pm

Posted by: peter mumme at August 18, 2006 02:34 AM

Dear Terry, I want to 'go digital' from my trusty old Canon EOS 50E and 380 EX speedlite. I would like something small but with autofocus, image stabilisation, no 'red eye,' 28 to 200 mm and auto-fill-in flash, if possible. Canon Ixus, Lumex TZI and Sony Cybershot series take my eye. Please could you tell me which model(s) fulfill my requirements, if any, as I can,t afford the digital equivalent of my old (and heavy) friend. Or have you any other suggestions?

Posted by: Dick Sutcliffe at August 24, 2006 11:54 PM

Dick:

You should look at the Canon Ixus 800is and the Canon S3IS. The Ixus is a pocketable camera and the S3is is a small pseudo SLR with, unfortunately, an electronic viewfinder. They are both excellent cameras.

The Sony Cybershot W series cameras are also very good.

Posted by: Terry at August 25, 2006 03:12 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the security code you see here

(you may use HTML tags for style)