« [REVIEW—HEWLETT PACKARD Photosmart A716] | Main | [ EXPOSE YOURSELF ] »

April 06, 2007

[OPENING UP THE VISTA]

 

AFTER A YEAR OF DILLY DALLYING DPEXPERT has at last got around to getting a new computer.

Now we have a dual core processor, 4 gigabytes of RAM, 300 gigabytes of hard drive space and 512 megabytes of memory on the video card. Plus we treated ourselves to the Dell 2407WFP 60cm wide screen LCD Monitor with 1920 by 1200 pixel resolution that nearly persuades us that the CRT monitor has had its day.

Now for Windows Vista – to see what it has to offer the digital photographer that we didn’t get with XP.

Before buying Vista in one of its forms (home basic, home premium or ultimate) we downloaded the Vista Upgrade Advisor. This scans the system and advises which components need upgrading, which applications and peripherals won’t work with Vista and which version of Vista is best for the machine.

Any version of Nero, except for the most current one, must be removed before installation. Some old drivers for printers and scanners may need to be updated. Some programs will work but may have problems. And there must be a minimum of 15gb of hard drive space.

Installing over Windows XP was painless, except that Adobe programs think they have been installed illegally on a new computer and demand reactivation every time they open.

The Vista graphical user interface is a big improvement on XP. Machines with fast processors, lots of RAM and plenty of memory on the video card can run the flashest interface, called Aero Glass.

The Vista photo viewing and editing sub-program is called Photo Gallery and it is a disappointment. It opens fast enough to serve as the default image viewer, and it will even open some RAW files but it does not support editing of these images.

Only JPEG and TIFF files can be edited in Photo Gallery, and only to change white balance, saturation, brightness and contrast. Images can be cropped and red eye removed but there is no sharpening function. An attempt to open file types that Photo Gallery doesn’t like results in advice to change format by opening the image in Paint and then saving it in another form to reopen in PG. Not likely.

Movie Maker will turn images into a slide show and burn it to DVD, just as in XP, and it is possible to create a high definition show which is spectacular on the right monitor.

Nikon has a free download applet that makes Vista show NEF (Nikon’s RAW) files in thumbnail form in a folder window. Without this little add-on the files show with generic icons.

A group of images – including RAW files – can be selected in the thumbnail window and displayed as an instant slideshow but it seems that it can’t be saved.

The high resolution image handling of the latest Windows Media Player is excellent. HD video can be edited in Movie Maker and exported as a PAL HD file.

Vista is different from XP in look and feel, so a little relearning is necessary. However the changes are all for the better and the new operating system is smoother and more elegant in the way it works. We were surprised to find that it is slightly faster in opening applications and getting them up to working speed. We won’t be reverting to XP.

 

UPDATE: Since installing Windows Vista we have had endless problems with Adobe's CS2.3 At first the problem was that Photoshop demanded reactivation every time it was run. We uninstalled and reinstalled the program and almost immediately it said that we had activated too many times! And, after two days, our "30 day grace period" had expired!

InDesign won't even open and now we find that all the apps in CS2.3 are inoperative.

All attempts to reactivate the programs using the Adobe automatic reactivation-by-phone system have ended in frustration and rage.

It is clear that anyone running CS2.3 and not intending to upgrade to CS3 really must stay with Windows XP. A quick check on the Web shows that users everywhere are having these problems in various forms. Adobe says they are not to blame because CS2 was created well before Vista. Microsoft have nothing to say on the subject.

The bottom line is: Adobe CS2.x will not work with Windows Vista.

Posted by terry at April 6, 2007 12:58 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1229

Comments

I'll add this for our fellow photographers ...

Vista is still missing a few thousand drivers for a start and developers are struggling to make their software work with the current release.

Wait until at least early 2008 to consider moving to Vista - even if a new machine is shipped with Vista. (Sure, you can test it anytime you want)

Dell don't even use Vista in any of their offices (for general admin), other than in support, where it's used for testing and evaluation. This is pretty normal in the corporate environment - it's all the stuff we know well and that is suitable for networking like XP and Linux.

As I see it, technically have the right to ask for XP SP2 for your new machine, without having to pay extra. I'd insist or take your money elsewhere.

For the time being just stay with XP SP2 (or Win 2K). Be sensible and be happy.

Posted by: Concerned From Woy Woy at April 9, 2007 04:19 AM

Terry,

In the March 2007 Windows Vista Application Compatibility Update was an update for 'Adobe Creative Suite CS2' and no doubt there will be more of these Application Package Updates rolling out monthly/bi-monthly and sorry I don't have any specifics of when or if there will be something for CS2.3.

Also when I first read this article in the Green Guide a couple of weeks ago I was going to shoot you an e-mail suggesting you get yourself a USB Key (2Gb or 4Gb) that can handle the Windows Vista Readyboost function as you will find it is the cheapest and one of the most effective hardware upgrades you can have regarding Windows Vista.

You can check out the following links for tech details and Grant Gibson's excellent list of devices that work with ReadyBoost and those that do not. Ideally the theory is to match your USB Readyboost device to the amount of RAM installed in your machine though 4Gb USB Drives are still rather expensive though a 2Gb device you will see a remarkable increase in Windows Vista speed once you plug one of these in. (I grabbed a 1Gb for $24 today for a friend and he was most impressed with the value and speed/caching increase that $24 gave him)

http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2006/12/31/readyboost-money-well-spent-but-what-s-fast-enough.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/tomarcher/archive/2006/06/02/615199.aspx
http://www.grantgibson.co.uk/misc/readyboost/

------

Concerned From Woy Woy

A couple of points :-

Windows Vista ships with around 27,000 Drivers with roughly a 40/60 ratio of what is on the installation media and what is available through Windows Update. It is not a Microsoft responsibility to ship drivers for every device it really is the device vendor and many of the mainstream device vendors are lacking to say the least.

Many corporations will not move straight away to Vista just as the case was when XP came out many hung off until SP1.

AMD for one are jumping at the opportunity as Robert McLaws posted regarding an internal AMD memo here.

So I am calling on all AMD employees to recognize and embrace everything Windows Vista represents and make it part of our DNA, to understand that we hold the keys to the kingdom in ways no one else does.

Posted by: Stephen at April 12, 2007 05:01 PM

Terry, I have added some more information over at the Bleeding Edge that may help or may not help regarding CS2.3.

Posted by: Stephen at April 13, 2007 03:13 AM

Stephen:

Thanks for your suggestions. I had, in fact, made sure that all the compatibility updates were installed.

I have been having conversations with Adobe people and they are sticking to the story that CS2 was conceived long before there was a chance to test it on Vista. The solution is to buy CS3 at the end of the month.

This is pretty unsatisfactory considering that the combined price of Vista plus CS3 will be more than a well-specced computer.

I am using Photoshop CS3 beta and I am guessing that Adobe is making the beta widely available to CS2 owners because they know there is a problem.

For the time being my advice to people for whom CS2 is a vital part of their operations is to hold off on installing Vista. I see all sorts of speculation on the Web -- some reckon that it might be a problem with CS2 and dual core processors; others think that the problem is having more than one hard drive; some suggest "run as administrator" as a solution -- it isn't. Others reckon that it is an Adobe conspiracy to punish Microsoft for some legal argy bargy the companies were involved in in the EU.

My copy of InDesign CS2 won't even open any more, but I suspect that might be a problem unique to me. I have been supplied with a beta of InDesign CS3 and that works fine.

And so it goes.

Terry

Posted by: Terry at April 14, 2007 03:16 AM

I am still having the same issues however I noticed your posting for the 15th and it idicates that you got InDesign working with some new patch that automatically installed.

I tried the Adobe Manual Update and updated everything I could and I still have the same issue.

Posted by: Zack at April 17, 2007 04:32 PM

Zack:

What happened was this. Last Sunday the Adobe update notification popped up on the screen. I selected Install and away it went, updating a number of CS2 apps. Once the update was complete I tried opening InDesign -- the one app that wouldn't even open -- and bingo! There is was. Working perfectly.

Have you set up your Adobe suite to automatically check for and notify of updates?

TL

Posted by: Terry at April 18, 2007 01:32 AM

Terry, can you tell us what this new high end machine of yours cost? Was it a put together box, or a brand name machine?

Posted by: Robin at April 22, 2007 12:47 PM

Robin:

Thereby hangs a tale.

Do you ever shop at www.graysonline.com.au? It is an online auction place, a bit like ebay only more interesting, I think.

Companies like Toshiba, Sony, Panasonic, Canon, Olympus, Dell, HP -- and more -- dispose of their superseded stock or stuff in open boxes through Grays.

It so happened that HP advertised a huge [about 66] bunch of highly specced PCs [AMD dual core, 4g RAM, 300g HD, 512mb video card, two optical drives, Windows XP Media centre installed]. HP says the RRP was $3000. Most of them sold for around $1300. That's what I paid.

Why were HP offering such a bargain? I am guessing that they reckoned they couldn't sell $3000 PCs loaded with XP and they couldn't open the boxes to load Vista because that would be too labour costly and in any case an open box makes a doodad second hand. So they decided to cut their losses [there wouldn't have been any, of course] and sell for less. And there still seems to be a steady stream of HP/Compaq PCs on Grays, not quite as flash as the one I bought but still good value.

With Grays you have to pay a 12.5% commission plus delivery -- all up it came to just over $1500, a price with which I was well pleased.

The 24in monitor I bought direct from Dell. I paid $1100. I see that they are now selling them for $1000.

I have installed Vista Home Premium, which is the natural upgrade from XP Media.

I have done a bit of business with Grays -- speaker, CRT monitor, memory card etc -- and the system and service are very good.

TL

Posted by: Terry at April 23, 2007 12:22 AM

Wow, now that the secret is out of the bag we all know where to shop. Thanks for the info.
Robin.

Posted by: Robin at April 30, 2007 06:31 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the security code you see here

(you may use HTML tags for style)