« [ PUTTING ON THE GLAMOUR ] | Main | [ EPSON STYLUS PHOTO R290 printer ] »
November 14, 2007
[ PIGMENT OR DYE? WHICH PRINTER TO BUY ]
THERE WAS A TIME when it was only necessary to choose between Holden and Ford and Vegemite or Marmite. But these days we also have to agonise over the respective merits of pigment ink printers and dye ink printers. What is the difference?
The fundamental difference between the two types of ink is that dye is absorbed into the surface of the paper and pigments, which are microscopic insoluble beads of solid coloured material, sit on top of the paper.
Photographers are not interested in the chemistry and physics of the two ink types, just in what sort of prints they produce. We all want prints that are richly coloured, with excellent resolved detail and that will last forever stuck up unprotected on the fridge door.
The advantages of dye inks are that they tend to produce a wider colour gamut and higher resolution, particularly on high gloss paper. Canon’s Chromalife 100 dye inks, printed onto Canon’s Photo Paper Pro, produce spectacular results. The disadvantage is that dyes are much more susceptible to fading from exposure to air-borne pollutants and ultraviolet light.
Pigment inks have impressive longevity, resisting the fading effects of gas and UV much better. The downside is a slightly restricted colour gamut, coarser resolution and an effect known as “bronzing”, which is one unwanted consequence of using inks that leave a three dimensional topography of coloured beads on the surface of the paper.
Bronzing is the effect you get when viewing a pigment print off centre and areas of similar colour blend into each other and detail is obscured. So, for instance, if a print is mounted above head height on a wall and is viewed from below there is a good chance that the bronzing effect will be seen. This is more pronounced on glossy papers than on matte.
The severity of the bronzing effect seems to vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. Kodak solve the problem with their new pigment EasyShare 5300 printer by not selling a true gloss paper and by laying down a clear finish over the print. Epson also uses a clear “varnish” on prints on some types of paper. Canon prints seem to be most severely affected by bronzing. Hewlett Packard high gloss prints are not seriously affected.
Pigment ink printers will work with a range of paper types, including highly textured art papers and canvas, and the quality of black and white printing is outstanding.
Interestingly Epson is retreating from using pigment inks in its basic photo printers. It is claiming a print life of 200 years for its Claria dye inks.
So which system is better? Our guess is that for professional photographers there is no choice – it has to be pigment to avoid the wrath of disgruntled customers who have seen their print, exposed to air and UV, fade before their eyes. But for amateurs the choice is not so simple. Dye inks produce prints with a higher Wow! factor than pigment and, for everyone except Methuselah, they come with a lifetime guarantee if you store them in an album or box.
*
Posted by terry at November 14, 2007 09:56 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1387
Comments
Dyes are transparent and act in a way like photos were developed. Ah real rgb colour theory at play.
Pigments tend to be opaque some are classed as transparent but not as much as dyes.
Should we not compare the longevity of a normaly printed photo of the last 20 years to to the above dye based printers*. After all it was the negative that was designed to last not the print. Like todays file formats the the image is saved in, will they last as long as a negative let alone the media they are stored on
*{lets exclude high/professional developing and we will exclude the high/professional 3rd party inks for the ink/bubble/piazo jets)
In my most humble opinion it's the Fine Art Digital printing market that is most suited to pigment based ink printers and the growth in this area over the last 5 years has been amazing.
To capture more accuratly what the eye/camera saw at this stage I will stick to dye.
Kindest regards
Duncan
Posted by: Duncan at November 27, 2008 09:02 AM