« [ PHOTOGRAPHIC ART DECO ] | Main | [ YOU TOO CAN BE A PRO ] »

September 05, 2008

[REVIEW—NIKON D700 camera]

Nikon D700 img

Price: $4000 (body only)

Simply magnificent

The low-down: This 12 megapixel camera has an FX sensor (full 35mm film frame size) as used in the professional D3. The camera body is more akin to the DX (APS size sensor) D300, but without some of the touches like extra dust and moisture sealing. It lacks the extreme ruggedness of the D300 and the D3, but it sports the wonderful FX sensor. Ergonomics are excellent, with every important function accessible from external buttons, thumb wheels and knobs. The 7.5cm high resolution LCD is a dream. The auto focus and exposure systems, as shared with the D300 and D3, are class-leading. There is “live view” and continuous shooting with the standard battery is 5 frames per second. There is an HDMI video out for viewing images on high definition TV and monitors. There is automatic dust removal. And there is an artificial horizon – just like in an aeroplane – to check for horizontal precision!

Like: Like the D3 the D700 automatically detects DX lenses, which have a smaller exposure circle, and shows a crop rectangle in the viewfinder. You lose some pixels but you get a perfect picture. Images are noise free with wide dynamic range and beautiful tonal gradation. Auto bracketing can produce an amazing nine images at varied exposures or white balance.

Dislike: This is not a complaint, merely an observation. With a full frame sensor depth of field is reduced, by comparison with an APS sized sensor, for any given f stop. Closer attention needs to be paid of ISO, aperture and shutter speed. Fortunately the sensor is so free of image noise that you lose nothing by operating at a higher ISO.

Verdict: Someone has calculated that for a digital camera to match the resolving power of film it needs to have 14 megapixels on a full frame sensor. If that is right then this camera comes close to the ideal. Like its close siblings, the D300 and the D3, the D700 is superbly responsive. All functions are lightning fast and the 51 point auto-focus is outstanding. If you can afford it then run, don’t walk, to your nearest camera shop.

Posted by terry at September 5, 2008 01:42 AM

Worth Checking Out

Digital Cameras Sydney

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1602

Comments

Hi Terry... thanks for the review... I particularly interest with the AF performance on D700, as I found my D300 AF failed to focus on main object on quite a few occasions, especially when selecting continuous focus and 3D tracking. Thank you, Andy.

Posted by: Andy at September 5, 2008 03:03 PM

Andy: The D700 has exactly the same auto focus system as the D300 and the D3 -- i.e. a 51 point focus grid.

As a D300 owner myself I have come to the conclusion that as good as the system is it is not perfect, simply because it doesn't know what you want to focus on. I find that I have to move the camera, usually very slightly, to get a bunch of activated focus points in the right place, then hold the button halfway down (or user AF lock) and reframe.

When focus is really critical I use the single centre point option. And usually when people tell me that they can't get sharp focus this is the first thing I tell them to do -- set the camera to single centre point focus. Start from that as default and then get a feel for when the 51 point system is the way to go.

As for tracking a moving subject, that depends on setting the camera parameters correctly and having a lens with a very fast focus motor. For instance my Sigma HSM 70-200 is pretty quick to focus, but not quick enough to track.

TL

Posted by: Terry at September 6, 2008 01:07 AM

Terry, thank you for the response.

I read a comment on D3, that is has a superior processor to D300, hence more accurate AF. Is it true? If so, can you suggest the AF performance comparison between the three cameras? Is D700 as good as D3 for the AF?

Andy

Posted by: Andy at September 6, 2008 01:28 AM

Andy: I'm not sure what you are looking for here.

The D3 is a professional level full frame camera. It is Nikon's best. The D300 is what they call their "flagship" DX professional camera. The D700 sits between them. It has the full frame sensor of the D3 and it has some of the features of the D300, but in some ways it is a little inferior to the D300 -- in weather/dust sealing, for instance.

The D700 is intended for the wealthy amateur who isn't prepared to go all the way to a D3. And there are some good reasons not to. The D3, like all professional DSLRs, doesn't have an inbuilt flash. The D700, like the D300, uses the inbuilt flash as a "commander" to fire Nikon flashes [SB600/800/900] wirelessly. With the D3 you have to buy an expensive add-on to get flash wireless control. No big deal for a pro, but pretty expensive for an amateur who is not going to get so much use from it.

Also the D3 is a monster. It is incredibly heavy because it is designed to be dropped from a helicopter onto rocks just below the water level and to be picked up unscathed.

It has a two battery compartment on the bottom. The D700 is more like the D300 in mass and bulk.

All three cameras use the same focus and exposure controls. The D300 will generally look sharper because it has greater depth of field [at the same f stop] and is therefore more forgiving.

Let me stress, the D300 is not an inferior camera. It is an absolutely marvellous camera. But if you want the very best, built like a tank, no excuses and take-no-prisoners camera then the D3 is the one to buy. But take my word for it -- it won't produce sharper pictures, but it will produce "better" pictures -- larger frame, more
leeway for enlargement, more film-like tonal quality etc.

So here's the bottom line. The D3 is simply The Best. The D300 is the best DX DSLR on the market. The D700 was created to be a Canon 5D killer -- which it is.

If you are worried that you made a mistake buying the D300 then don't. If it is not focussing as precisely as you would like then, believe me, the fault is not in the camera. Nor in you. It's just a matter of getting to know the camera and how it works and adapting to its methods.

TL

Posted by: Terry at September 6, 2008 01:54 AM

Just letting you know that I bought the Nikon D300 and have not looked back.

Being mainly a sports photographer, I am happy with the extra reach as opposed to a full frame option.

Sure I like my landscapes. but my Tokina 12-24 f/4 handles them beautifully even if it equates to 18mm on FF. Then again my 80-200 f/2.8 also becomes 350mm which is a nice bonus.

Now I know when my photo turns out rubbish, that it was me and not the camera....

thanks
Kip

Posted by: Kipsta at September 24, 2008 01:41 AM

Kip
Have you tried to shoot sport indoor? Or indoor party at night without flash?

Posted by: Anonymous at September 28, 2008 08:33 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the security code you see here

(you may use HTML tags for style)