« [ Blow-up! ] | Main | [LET THERE BE LIGHT] »
October 02, 2008
[REVIEW–NIKON D90 with 18-105mm Nikkor lens]
Price: $1850 with 18-105mm lens.
Brilliant
The low-down: This 12 megapixel DSLR takes two features of the D300 – the CMOS image sensor and the 75mm high resolution LCD screen – and fits them into what is, in effect, the D80 body. Naturally there is live view and, the big surprise, there is movie mode, a first for DSLRs. (Canon has since matched this feature). Movie format is suitable for replay on HD TVs – 720 lines in-camera interpolated to 1080 for transfer. Camera essentials such as viewfinder and ergonomics are the best. Continuous shooting speed is 4.5fps. The supplied lens is optically above average for kit lenses and covers a useful focal length range and has in-lens image stabilisation. Focus is fast and quiet. The in-built flash can operate as the “commander”, controlling Nikon SB600/800/900 speedlights off-camera. Active D lighting increases dynamic range in high contrast situations – one professional of our acquaintance leaves this turned on all the time in his D3. Image storage is on SD cards.
Like: The low light capabilities of this camera are similar to the D300, which means ISO1600 is the new ISO400. The image quality at high ISO settings is breathtaking with very little noise evident in even the trickiest bits of open shadow. Nikon make low light photography a joy with the discrete focus-assist lamp, much better than the pop-up flash arrangement used by most competitors.
Dislike: Presumably it is in the camera firmware and doesn’t cost anything, but does a serious DLSR really need to have a slideshow creator, with music, built in?
Verdict: This camera is a joy to use. It feels right in the hand. The bright viewfinder displays all the shooting parameter information. The image quality is spectacular. Even the instruction manual and menu system speak quality and careful attention to the photographer’s needs. When the D90 was introduced to a room full of cynical camera reviewers recently the announcement of the price brought a small muttering from the crowd. So much camera for, relatively speaking, so little money. And that’s the full RRP. Highly recommended.
*
Posted by terry at October 2, 2008 12:27 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1615
Comments
I am considering the D90 and was wondering what would be the best all round lens to match to it. I would prefer the flexibility of a zoom with a reasoble range. I appreciate the issues in providing advice without fully knowing the expectations of the user. I suppose I am seeking advice on what lens to purchase that will match and /or enhance the body and any future body upgrade. Perhaps the Nikkor AF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF-ED VR II DX? Any advice greatly appreciated.
Cheers Les
Posted by: Les at February 11, 2009 09:40 PM
Les: The Nikkor 18-200 is not a bad lens but I generally find that a zoom range of about 18-80 makes for a mechanically and optically better unit. 200mm on a D90 is equivalent to 300mm on a 35mm camera -- do you really need that? And if you do why not buy a 200mm prime lens? I have a 180mm Nikkor that does very nicely when I need the extra reach and I bought it secondhand for very little money. TL
Posted by: Terry at February 12, 2009 02:59 PM
Terry: The majority of shots would be hand held or mini tripod taken on walks and at gatherings. My mate (and family) gets a bit frustrated now without me changing lenses - though there would be times I could get away with it.
Close up - flowers, Insects - ground textures while standing, faces.
Mid Range - birds, scenery, figures, structures.
Long range - as above.
At distance I would like to catch that random close up image that is gone when you arrive. With a 35mm slide one could do that to some extent on the wall screen.
I look for capturing a time in space in memory of the event or location and to bring to detail things the eye normally just scans over. The range and quality of the lens and the capacity of the camera body will govern how far that space extends. I tend to use the zoom (current digital) to frame shots and have not used programs like photoshop, to date, to crop. I expect that the outcomes will be a product of what I purchase and governed by it to some extent.
I would be aiming for sharp clear images and would be somewhat frustrated with myself if I purchased a long zoom and the results were no better than a digital zoom and the lens overall did not match a shorter zoom; which from your response it will not. Any further advice appreciated. Les
Posted by: Les at February 12, 2009 10:39 PM
Les: Start with the 18-105 Nikkor lens. I know that the 18-200 seems like some sort of ideal all-in-one lens that can be left on the camera all the time but I am not persuaded.
And you should be coming to terms with Photoshop -- PS Elements is not that expensive and it will give you so much more control over your images. The great advantage of digital over film lies in this area of post-camera manipulation. What we once did in the darkroom we can now do on the computer. And cropping is perhaps the most basic of all image improvement techniques, whether in the darkroom or on the PC.
TL
Posted by: Terry at February 13, 2009 08:52 AM
Terry
Thanks for this site and your green guide column.
My Dad got me interested in photography. He used Leicas and I now use an R9 with a 50mm, 90mm and 100mm. As much as I love my Leica lenses, I find the need to scan everything frustrating.
Nowadays I use my Minolta Dimage A1 far more often than the R9. Its optics are quite good but it's limited in many respects.
Having read your review, I'm drawn to the Nikon D90 but I know little about Nikkor lenses. People rave about Leica glass but I don't see much unqualified praise of Nikkor.
This is a big decision for me and I'd be very glad of any thoughts you might be kind enough to share.
Posted by: David at May 16, 2009 08:28 PM
David: With lenses it is strictly a case of getting what you pay for. The best Nikkor lenses are magnificent, but they are expesnsive, just like Leica optics.
There are cheap Nikkor lenses which are a mixed bag. Generally the fixed focal length prime lenses are all good, even the relatively inexpensive ones. But with zooms the nexus between price and quality is fixed.
I have owned Nikon D70, D80 and D300 cameras and I have loved them all. And I have managed to acquire some good second hand Nikkor lenses at reasonable prices, mainly on eBay. My Micro Nikkor 60mm lens is my favourite piece of glass and it cost me $450 on eBay. I also have a good Nikkor 180mm that I got cheaply. One of the advantages of buying Nikon or Canon is the large number of second hand lenses that will work on these cameras.
Hope this helps. TL
Posted by: dpexpert at May 17, 2009 12:59 PM

